CHANGE TO PLANNING POLICY – SOUTH WORCESTERSHIRE COUNCILS

Planning policy is fundamental to the determination of planning applications because it provides the framework against which proposals are assessed, ensuring consistency, transparency, and fairness in decision-making.  The starting point for determination is the Local Plan in accordance with S38(6) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.

Local Plan policies guide decision-makers in assessing whether a proposal accords with the development plan, which is the primary basis for decisions unless material considerations indicate otherwise.  Planning policy also helps manage competing demands for land, protects important assets such as heritage and the natural environment, and promotes sustainable development.  Over time Councils are required to review their Local Plans (at least once every five years) to determine whether the existing policies remain effective and whether any changes are needed to reflect changes in national policy or local circumstances.

The South Worcestershire Development Plan Review (SWDPR) represents an updated planning framework prepared jointly by the local authorities covering South Worcestershire (Wychavon District Council, Malvern Hills District Council and Worcester City Council).  Now adopted, as of last month,  it supersedes the previous development plan (SWDP) and carries full statutory weight in decision-making. The SWDPR responds to updated evidence, including housing need, climate change objectives, and infrastructure requirements, ensuring that planning decisions reflect current priorities and national policy.

So, what are some of the key changes we now see as a result of the SWDPR compared to the SWDP which was adopted ten years ago?

  • The SWDPR extends the plan period to 2041, reflecting updated demographic projections and Government requirements and it significantly increases housing and employment land requirements aligning with the standard method and unmet needs for housing supply;
  • It introduces a stronger emphasis on strategic urban extensions and new settlements, such as Worcestershire Parkway Garden Town and Throckmorton. It therefore represents a clearer spatial strategy concentrating development in fewer, larger locations by comparison to the SWDP;
  • The SWDPR places greater weight on delivery of transport, schools, and community infrastructure alongside growth. Strategic allocations are now closely tied to infrastructure provision and phasing requirements;
  • Many SWDP policies have been reviewed, expanded, or replaced to reflect new evidence and national guidance. This includes more detailed policies on topics such as: design quality, biodiversity/net gain, rural uses (including a new policy on equestrian development), housing mix and affordability;
  • Updated policies responding to climate change, carbon reduction, and sustainable design, reflecting changes in national policy since 2016. This includes stronger expectations for energy efficiency, sustainable transport, and environmental protection.

Overall, the SWDPR is not just an update but a relatively substantive evolution of the 2016 SWDP, with an evolved development requirements, a more strategic spatial approach, and stronger environmental and infrastructure-led planning principles.  We await to see how some of the policies are considered “in action” over more applications in the coming months.